I’ve had a Macintosh on my desk since the mid-90s and promise not to bore you with the details of why and how here. Suffice to say that’s it has been and remains a willing assistant and cyber friend. Over the intervening years, lots of acquaintances have also moved to Macs and to a greater or lesser extent, feel much the same way.
It’s happened with cameras too. Despite having been a Nikon user for decades and having also dipped my toes in Leica’s lifegiving waters, my move to Fuji in 2015 was as much a friend-making experience as it was an exploration of a new and different technology.
My first purchase was an X-Pro1, which was joined almost immediately by the pocketable X100T. Within days, both went on a month long trip to India and between them, produced some exquisite photographs for me.
I’d initially planned to use the X-Pro1 with my 35mm Summicron and 50mm Summilux, together with the 25mm Zeiss Biogon that had got me started with DearSusan.* Fuji’s M to X mount adaptor works really well, but I still had an itch to try out some of Fuji’s own glass and suddenly, there was a 35mm f1.4 in my bag.
It’s a fantastic piece of kit and I use it a lot. It doesn’t quite have the 35 ‘Cron’s almost film-like rendering, but does have autofocus. Which do I choose when it’s time to hit the streets? Often both.
A 16mm f1.4 and the 90mm f2 soon followed.
Then the 23mm f1.4.
An X-Pro2? Of course.
I still wasn’t done and as the 56 f1.2 arrived, the X100T left for a buddy down the road, to be replaced by the X100F.
For a while, yes.
X-H1? Nah. I’ve got two X-Pros, what would I do with another X camera?
I fought that decision off for a year, but found out what I could achieve late last year when the X-H1 arrived along with the SBH (16-55 f2.8 zoom). And a 100-400 zoom for shooting game in our national parks.
Looking at this list, I ought to feel a little embarrassed, but don’t. Every item has a distinct personality and which one I choose to accompany me any- and everywhere is (surprisingly) often an emotional rather than need-based choice.
The X-Pro1 is quiet, competent and often surprises with its ability to deliver fantastic images, despite its same-day focussing and limited digital processing capabilities.
The X-Pro2 moved the marker, being just as capable as the -1, but much more and all round competent. Modern and faster.
The X-H1 – much denigrated by the pundits at first – is a technological wunderkind and does the difficult jobs. It can drive my flash system and its IBIS is fantastic in low light and difficult conditions. It used to wear the 16-55 zoom, but was a real (SB) handful and now, often heavier than I want to be hauling around. Increasingly, there’s a prime of some kind mounted, auto or manual focus, it’s equally at home with either.
Post processing Fuji files is subject to the usual de-mosaicing issues – now largely solved – and I find Lightroom well up to the task of massaging the look and feel I want. I’m currently having another go-round with Luminar and like what I’m seeing there, too.
In recent times, several other photographers I know have also joined the X-Pro ranks; our own Steve Mallett, DS progenitor Caroline and most visibly, occasional contributor, Kirk Tuck – here and here too.
There must be something in it.
* My purchase of a Sony NEX-7 soon led me to buy an M mount adaptor to use with the Leica lenses (50 ‘lux and 35 ‘cron) I already owned. The need for a wider field of view led me to a review of the Zeiss 25mm Biogon on DearSusan and the rest is history.
Never miss a post
Like what you are reading? Subscribe below and receive all posts in your inbox as they are published. Join the conversation with thousands of other creative photographers.
Please log in again. The login page will open in a new tab. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.