23 March. Home.
To recap; a few days in Singapore – our favourite city in the world – followed by a quick trip up to George Town (Penang), to remind ourselves how much we enjoy being there, too.
In part 1, the X-Pro2 was brand new and the post was taken up with black and white images, made using the very impressive Acros simulation. If Fuji achieve nothing else with this piece of software mastery, they’ll inevitably attract the attentions of Nikon, Canon and Sony users, wanting similar, easy-on-the-eye tones and rich blacks.
A big thumbs up on that one.
To colour then. A significant strength for Fuji, with the X-Trans sensor – no I don’t claim to understand how it works – especially the softer tones. Soft colour isn’t so easy in a city, where brash is a byword.
So, instead of trekking the city looking for specific photo opportunities, I decided to shoot what I saw, with both X-Pros (and my trusty X100T) and add some images from George Town. Now I’m home, I’ll go look for the more subtle colours in the late summer sunrises, sunsets and landscapes.
I’m going to keep the narrative to a minimum; doubtless hundreds of blogs are posting similar opinions of the -2, so I’ll stick to what we used to call caption stories in the good old ink on paper publishing days. ‘kay with you?
Two small points I do need to cover, however.
The -2’s set-up dumping issue might have happened to me. On one early morning foray into the city, I did notice that I was shooting only JPGs and not RAW+JPG. The irritating focus chirping had also re-started – I turn all sounds off as a matter of course. Two minutes and I’d sorted the problem and had cause to wonder whether my larger than usual hands had lagged my enthusiasm and failed to develop the necessary muscle memory, hitting a button or two without me noticing. No matter, it wasn’t serious and in Fuji’s usual kaizen style response, a firmware update to prevent recurrences, is promised within days.
The second might be a non-event. But just in case you might be venturing into southeast Asia, be aware that the -2 works very hard, especially in Acros mode, where the sensor and X-Trans processor do all the digital doodads to make fabulous black and whites. The daily ambient temperatures were close to 40C most days and I wasn’t surprised to discover that the body of the camera around the command dial grew perceptibly warm. In it’s defence, the -2 never missed a beat and battery life wasn’t impacted, but you might still want to bear the situation in mind.
In closing, the -2 easily lives up to the pre-launch hype. As a convinced -1 user, the transition has been almost painless, it’s too soon to say much about it, but the increased resolution not yet apparent as the printing cycle will only now start. Lens choices are easy; the 35mm f1.4 is a no brainer for street work. The 90mm f2 likewise, but it is heavy and quite obvious, especially with the photo-nerd style (read massive) lens hood in use.
My recently purchased 16mm f1.4 got used once (briefly) and is probably best left at home if you’re planning anything other than extreme street shooting.
Of course, the fantastic X100T also fills in gaps, so I will almost certainly opt for that and leave the 16mm lens out of my kit when I pack for the DearSusan workshop in Paris in a few days time.
Please log in again. The login page will open in a new tab. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.
Paul, if gear is to be judged by what it inspires its owner/user to perform, then the Fuji is a super piece of kit, because your pics are gorgeous. I am beginning to worry about the forthcoming DS workshop, where Pascal and I will only have our gazillion pixels and boat anchors to see if they measure up…:-)
You’re in no danger – I had one of those Damascene revelations (when it was still safe to mention the S country) many years ago. I’ll tell you the story in Paris, over a glass of something tasty.
LOL – not that anyone needs to care what I think – but since it’s open for comment, here are a couple, Paul.
Because I love natural lighting, I love your shot of the solo drinker and the one under it of the tea drinker – also the silhouette shots.
I am mightily impressed by the natural colors coming through in one photo after another. I used to dislike Kodacolor slide film, because they punched up some colors to give it more appeal in their mass (amateur) market, and I recently saw several articles from a pro with colors I can only describe as “garish”. It’s a sharp & refreshing contrast, seeing colors like the ones in your shots, and – frankly – practically all the material on DearSusan.
Since you love your X100T, you might like to look at this article (if you haven’t already) – some interesting comments, but more to the point, some practical suggestions for kitting it out to make a real workhorse of it:
And while I’m spruiking for Ken, everyone might care to read this article of his:
As always, it’s the photographer who takes the picture, not the lens – but he’s making some very valid points and the article’s a good read. For “true” photographers, anyway.
I am drawing a great deal of comfort from his suggestion that a w/angle, a standard and a tele are (a) better than a zoom, (b) likely to be cheaper overall, if the quality is there, and (c) MORE than enough – so I can probably skip the tele (which I almost have – although the macro’s a 100mm lens, if I need a tele). That’s exactly what I did last year, when I re-equipped.
The only think I’m unhappy with is my little compact – nice, but not quite nice enough. Maybe the X100T . . .
Comments are here for just what you think. I’d welcome more feedback from DS’ readers.
I’ve been a visitor to Ken Rockwell’s site for many years. His bizarre parsimony makes me smile a lot.
And, he has similarly odd ideas when it comes to colour saturation. I’d be the first to admit that Web servers and browsers do tend to over compress and destroy colour data in posts, but even so, I don’t think Ken has bright orange children. Nor are his images of various critical palms, far away street lights and neon signs quite as saturated as he might like you to think.
Still, I visit because he is something of a lone voice, often diametrically opposed to the collective bellow of enthusiasm that issues from other Web opinionistas. And, I often find myself agreeing with him.
I didn’t buy my X100T because of his ideas, but they certainly played a part. Mainly I bought it because it is an extraordinary camera that promised to deliver images which would show whatever skills I may have, in the best possible light (if you’ll forgive a poor pun).
Oh yes, Ken also seems to have a pretty good technical handle on what he is talking about. That’s an essential in my book.
Hehe, those orange children made me smile – how often have I thought that? Maybe his site should contain a warning sticker, like: “Too much Velvia might change your colour perception into mine!” 😉
Nice photos here, and a good report about the Fujis. Love that Acros look from part 1.
I looked up his comments because they’re often “interesting” and stimulate further thought or research. I found another comment of his, on the X100T, which ran quite contrary to his comments in his review of the cam – suggesting that comparatives he’d shot with various cams showed the X100T didn’t stack up against a Canon he compared it with. As you would know, when you go onto his site you can blow those photos up – and I did. And I was damned if I could see any justification for that comment – in fact, I found it almost impossible to detect any difference whatsoever between the shots he took with the Canon in question (a full frame pro model) and the X100T, although I had an instant distaste for the other comparisons – not as sharp, Kodacolor slide film vivid colors, whatever.
I’ve come across odd comments sledging Ken, which I found quite distasteful. He goes to a lot of trouble to share a vast amount of information – hopes we’ll send him money occasionally, which any of us who use his site a lot should probably do – and as far as I’m concerned, it’s extremely rude and quite uncalled for to make unpleasant comments about anyone on the net. I use the info I find on the net for what I can get out of it – I never assume anyone is “right” OR “wrong” – they are sharing, and we should appreciate that. And mind our [web] manners!
That said – the pair of you have sparked my interest. I’ve made no secret of the fact I want something better than my present compact – I am attracted to a bigger sensor, a mirror cam, a cam with an EVF – I am also attracted by the appearance of it, even if that’s pure nostalgia. Currently I’d say it’s ticking more items on my hit list than anything else I’ve been able to find to replace the compact. So I’ll take a keen interest in the photos from your X100T, Paul.
Paul, I’ll keep this short and sweet. WOW!
Equally short; thanks.
Truly beautiful pics, thanks for sharing.
When i see the colors in your shots and i compare them to the colors i get in mine, i feel like a toddler with a bunch of stabilo :'( It extends to every entry on DS ^^
Great review, a pleasure to watch (and to read of course 🙂 ) and equally inspiring !
I didn’t like the X-Pro 1 – it simply had too many issues and constantly got in the way of my photographic process, so it wasn’t a good “tool” for me. I also disliked the Velvia “film simulation” – I use the term lightly as I agree with Ken Rockwell that it looked like something the office junior had been asked to create, and didn’t seem much like Velvia film to me. I don’t know whether the Adobe plug-in used resembles the Fuji in-camera “look”, but most other cameras have “saturated” settings that produce similarly unrealistic results, in my opinion.
I liked the X100 (original, sans X-Trans sensor) more than the X-Pro, but it took about 2-3 years of firmware updates to make it the tool it should have been when released. A camera that stimulates the creative juices is a good one, but so is a tool that doesn’t get in the way of the photo-taking process in whatever range of situations you use it.
By coincidence, I made a similar trip to Singapore and Georgetown recently, but took rather different pictures. It would be interesting to share and compare, if comments allowed it.
Artuk, feel free to send a few photos to me (or links) and I can add them to your comment. Also, if you feel like writing a post, lots of readers have become occasional guest writers. You are most welcome.
Thanks for your reply, and apologies for my delayed response, as I am only intermittently looking at Dear Susan. I would be very interested to write a post about some of my experiences, I will email you privately to discuss further. Regards.
Great! I look forward to it.
All the best,