Shooting at low apertures against the produces sun stars that can add a lot to some pictures. The more open the diaphragm, the more blurry (scattered around the frame) the sun’s diffraction patter. Conversely, the less open the diaphragm, the better individual rays appear. 2 for every blade in the diaphragm.
But there seems to be a limit with the Sony A7r & Sony Zeiss FE Sonnar 2,8/35 ZA, as illustrated in the photograph below 🙁
The sun rays are there all right, prolonged by a play of light and shadows in mist produced by the sun’s heat on the morning frost. But so is an unwanted battalion of “spots” surrounding the sun in a geometrical pattern, shown here in high contrast.
I can only imagine the increased depth of field at f/20 has picked up reflections of the sun on the sensor ???
Whatever the reason, this is going to be a post-processing nightmare, if I can get rid of them at all …
It wouldn’t be so bad if these spots only appeared at f/20, but they are plainly visible, although in a more diffused manner at much more mundane apertures, such as f/11. See below, original jpeg :
This one could be saved with a panoramic crop, but still, there’s a major (coating ?) problem that will pester all those fans of sun stars (probably astronomy fas as well) …
Note that these two pictures also display what Leica Boss called the bullseye colour shift (explanations on how to cure that are in the article).
Any clues ? Sony, perhaps ?
#1096. So … I (almost) bought a new Sony Camera
#1094. Film or Photography? Which is best for storytelling? (3/3)
#1091. Film or Photography? Which is best for storytelling? (2/3)
#1088. Dolls Bizarre
#921. Monday Post (28 Oct 2019 – Workshop update: the Layer Cake effect
#1075. The vanity lens. Or is it? The truly excellent Laowa 15mm f:2.0, a.k.a. Gargantua
Please log in again. The login page will open in a new tab. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.